Mark Phillips: The American Question
4/2/04: "Contractors".
Ideological
narratives
can be as short as one word.
According to today's
Washington Post,
The four men brutally slain Wednesday in Fallujah were among the most elite
commandos working in Iraq to guard employees of U.S. corporations and were
hired by the U.S. government to protect bureaucrats, soldiers and intelligence
officers.
Employees of a mercenary-supply company called Blackwater Security Consulting, the
men were alumni of the most elite commando units in the U.S. military, including the
Navy's SEALs, the Army's Special Forces, and the super-secret Delta Force. Working
as private soldiers allowed them to earn an average of $1,000 per day in the hazardous
conditions of Iraq: far more than their military salaries.
It's not clear how many of these "contractors" are employed by the
U.S. government in Iraq, Afghanistan, and we-don't-know-where-all-else. It's not
clear what they're doing there, and it's not clear whether or how
codes of warfare such as the Geneva Conventions apply to them. This is perhaps one
reason they're considered useful.
Why not call them what they are? Because "mercenaries" are often considered
bad, and Americans can't be narrated as bad guys. Because a clear statement of U.S.
occupation policy and the means used to achieve it would probably diminish public
support. Because obscurity is often in the best interest of oppression.
The Americans killed in Fallujah this week were mercenaries. Labelling them
"contractors" obscures their role and purpose.
Trouble Tickets defines
ideology
as discourse which renders invisible that which should be obvious.
The term "contractor" is a current example.
Back to 2004 menu
Back to Mark's Blogspace main page
More Information
- "All roads lead to Tehran", Phillips
- "Complexity", Phillips
- "weblogs: a history and perspective", blood
- "You've got blog", Mead
- EatonWeb Portal
- BlogHop
- Blogger
- Blogroots
- The Pepys Project
|