January 12, 2006: A "Self-Defense" Argument for SE
As Mark Phillips has proposed, self-emancipation as a normative principle of just political practice can at least on occasion be justified on the basis of "self-defense." As historical support for this view, I would recommend a superb recent study by Christopher Strain: Pure Fire: Self-Defense as Activism in the Civil Rights Era (University of Georgia Press, 2005). Strain argues in this book that we need to rethink the hard-and-fast distinction sometimes drawn between, say, King's pacifism and the various criticisms of nonviolence as a strategy made by Malcolm X (but also Robert Williams before him and the Black Panthers after him). In fact, as Strain argues, King and Malcolm X (and Williams and the Black Panthers) shared a commitment to self-defense (and, I would add, SE).
Comments
I realize that this is completely tangential, but it's interesting that the Panthers made the strategic decision to "theatricalize" self-defense. Carrying carbines and bandoliers into the state capital; appearing armed at press conferences. It's arguable that that particular decision was a profound disaster. But again this is totally off topic.
Posted by: Mark Phillips | January 13, 2006 11:39 AM